How We Rate Jeton Casinos

Every score on this site comes from the same six-part rubric. Rather than walk you through it as a brochure, this page answers the questions readers tend to ask about it.

What goes into a score?

Six criteria, each marked out of 10 and then weighted. Payments lead because this is a Jeton site: a casino with a great bonus and a clumsy cashier is a poor choice for a wallet user.

Payments covers whether Jeton works for deposits, withdrawals or both, the limits per transaction, fees the casino adds, and how long a payout sits in review. Bonus terms looks at wagering, maximum bet while wagering, expiry and any payment methods excluded from the offer. Licensing checks the regulator and licence number named on the site against the operating company. Verification covers when documents are requested and what triggers extra checks. Games and mobile play close the list; they matter, but almost every casino we see clears a sensible bar there.

Why does a casino with a smaller bonus sometimes rank higher?

Because 28% of the score sits with the cashier and only 18% with the bonus. A casino that sends winnings back to your Jeton wallet within a day will usually outrank one with twice the welcome package that pays out through a different route after three days. If the bonus is what you care about most, the bonus row in each review lets you re-sort the list in your head.

What keeps a casino off the list entirely?

No score can save a casino that fails one of these: no licence or operating company named anywhere on the site, a history of unpaid withdrawals, bonus terms that allow winnings to be voided at will, or a refusal to serve players from the country of the edition. We also drop a casino when Jeton quietly disappears from its cashier.

Is anything checked differently per country?

Yes, and that's the reason the site runs separate editions. In Canada we note that offshore casinos hold international rather than provincial licences, that most exclude Ontario, and whether Interac is available as a second route. In the UK, we state plainly that the casinos listed aren't UKGC-licensed. German pages say the same about the GGL and explain that OASIS doesn't apply offshore; Dutch pages do it for the Ksa and Cruks. In France, where the ANJ doesn't license online casinos at all, we say so. In Poland we flag that payments to blocked gambling domains can be refused by banks. Currency handling is checked everywhere: a wallet held in CAD, EUR or NOK avoids a conversion only if the casino accepts that currency too.

Across every edition, the rule is the same: we never present an offshore casino as holding a local licence it doesn't have.

Do casinos pay for a better score?

No. Some listed casinos pay us a commission when readers sign up through our links, and that's disclosed at the top of every money page. The commission doesn't enter the rubric. A partner casino with a slow cashier scores low on payments like anyone else, and casinos we earn nothing from are reviewed when they're worth your time.

Who applies the rubric, and how often?

Ethan Caldwell reviews each casino against the six criteria and revisits a score when a casino changes its cashier, its licence details or its welcome terms. Scores are a snapshot of what we saw in the latest review cycle. Payout speed also depends on your own verification status and on the method you pick, so treat a timing figure as a typical case rather than a promise.